The Caspian Journal of Surgery upholds the principle that rigorous peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly excellence. Our reviewers play a critical role in safeguarding the scientific integrity, methodological soundness, and clinical relevance of the research we publish. Through their expertise and commitment, they not only shape the quality of individual manuscripts but also contribute to the advancement of surgical science as a whole. We value their voluntary service as an essential pillar of our editorial process and an enduring standard of academic collaboration.
The peer review process forms the backbone of our editorial policy. It ensures that every manuscript undergoes a comprehensive and impartial evaluation before publication. Reviewers serve as both gatekeepers and mentors—offering critical, constructive feedback that supports authors in improving their work, while maintaining the scientific standards our readers expect.
Type of Review: We follow a double-blind peer review system. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the process, minimizing potential bias and promoting objective assessment.
Number of Reviewers: Each submission is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. When needed, a third reviewer is consulted to resolve discrepancies.
Review Timeline: We aim to complete the initial review process within 2 weeks, ensuring a balance between efficiency and thoroughness.
Assessment Criteria: Reviewers are expected to evaluate submissions based on the following:
Originality and clinical relevance of the study
Appropriateness of research design and methodology
Accuracy and clarity of data interpretation
Ethical compliance and research transparency
Logical structure and quality of academic writing
We adhere to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and expect our reviewers to:
Treat all submissions as confidential documents
Disclose any potential conflicts of interest
Provide unbiased, evidence-based, and constructive feedback
Refrain from using any content or data before publication
Reviewers are also encouraged to recognize ethical concerns such as plagiarism, duplicate submissions, or research misconduct, and to report them to the editorial team.
We welcome qualified professionals in surgical and related disciplines to join our peer review panel. Suitable candidates typically:
Hold a medical doctorate or equivalent advanced academic degree
Possess board certification or subspecialty training in surgery
Have published peer-reviewed articles in reputable journals
Are experienced in research methodology and ethical peer review practices
Applications to become a reviewer can be submitted through our Reviewer Registration Form available on the journal’s website.
We value the expertise and time of our reviewers. To acknowledge their contributions, we offer:
Official certificates of review for each completed evaluation
Optional listing of reviewer names on our website (upon consent)
Priority consideration for future editorial roles
Early access to cutting-edge research in surgical sciences
The Caspian Journal of Surgery is deeply grateful for the dedication and professionalism of our reviewers. Their service not only upholds the quality of our publication but also fosters the global dissemination of reliable, evidence-based surgical research. Together, we contribute to the advancement of medical science and improved patient care.